A Troubling Trend in the Courts

Attribution: Heritage.org

Should judges act based upon reasoned legal arguments, or based upon their personal feelings and media coverage?  A controversial recent “statement” made by Justices Ginsburg and Breyer in a case that was the legal equivalent of a slam dunk raises serious questions about what really guides some judges.

In the case, American Tradition Partnership v. Bullock, the Court was asked to address a Montana Supreme Court opinion upholding a Montana ban on independent expenditures by corporations. This should be an easy case—after all, the Court ruled in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission that bans on independent political expenditures by corporations and unions violate the First Amendment.  Continue reading at:  heritage.org.

About Alan Berkelhammer

Opinions are my own and are not necessarily those of any organization or group.
This entry was posted in Constitution, Judicial Branch, National, Unalienable Rights. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply