Disgusting: Democrats Launch Smear Attacks on Amy Coney Barrett’s Adopted Children

by Matthew Boyle

Democrats began smearing Judge Amy Coney Barrett on Friday night before President Donald Trump even nominated her to become the next Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, which he is expected to do on Saturday afternoon.

Dana Houle, a Democrat activist who was once a chief of staff on Capitol Hill to a Democrat lawmaker, tweeted Friday night that he hopes Barrett is investigated over the children she and her husband adopted from Haiti. “I would love to know which adoption agency Amy Coney Barrett & her husband used to adopt the two children they brought here from Haiti,” Houle wrote.

“So here’s a Q: Does the press even investigate details of Barrett’s adoptions from Haiti?” Houle wrote in a follow-up tweet. “Some adoptions from Haiti were legit. Many were sketchy as hell. And if the press learned they were unethical & maybe illegal adoptions, would they report it? Or not bc it involves her children” Read the rest HERE.

About Alan Berkelhammer

Opinions are my own and are not necessarily those of any organization or group.
This entry was posted in 2020 Elections, Constitution, Environment, Executive Branch, Judicial Branch, Legislative Branch, Media, National, Unalienable Rights and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Disgusting: Democrats Launch Smear Attacks on Amy Coney Barrett’s Adopted Children

  1. David Martin says:

    You don’t even need to address the issue of the kids. All you need to understand is, this is just the latest, in a long list, of examples of how the Democrats prioritize Party and Power OVER Country and it’s People. This attitude is clearly universal in Democrat leadership and far too many rank-and-file Democrats follow along in lockstep because they’ve been conditioned to value solidarity over critical thinking.

  2. Joe Z says:

    Barrett is being pushed by the same anti-Trump Establishment crumbs that recommended anti-Trumpers Christopher Wray, Rod Rosenstein and many others. Barrett would side with two-faced Roberts on many decisions. She is pro-mask, pro-lockdown and even said she would defer to the Communist Pope in Rome on certain issues. Yikes! She would be just another terrible Trump pick.

    A much better choice would be Barbara Lagoa. She is much more a real-world conservative and would help Trump carry the Cuban and Latino vote in Florida, Arizona, Nevada and Texas. Plus, she would be far less likely to side with Roberts when he makes his lefty decisions. And, being Latina she would be easier to get approved than Barrett. The DemocRATS would have lots of ‘splainin’ to do to the Hispanic community why they are opposed to a female, Hispanic jurist.

    Selecting Barrett would be a move in the wrong direction which could haunt this country for many years to come.

  3. JOHNNY LIBERTY says:

    MARK MY WORDS, PRESIDENT TRUMP IS GONNA SIDE STEP THEIR OFFENSIVE ATTACK AND GIVE THE DEMS A ONE, TWO AND CHOOSE THE ONE HE THINKS IS BEST, ESPECIALLY IF IT NEEDS TO GET DONE BY Election Day.

Leave a Reply to Joe Z Cancel reply